User Tools

Site Tools


plant:tomato

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
plant:tomato [2024/08/06 15:51] rkoebnikplant:tomato [2025/02/03 22:38] (current) jfpothier
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 Author: [[https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Pavel_Beran2|Pavel Beran]]\\ Author: [[https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Pavel_Beran2|Pavel Beran]]\\
-Internal reviewer: [[https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Inga_Morocko-Bicevska2|Inga Moročko-Bičevska]]\\ +Internal reviewer: [[https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Inga_Morocko-Bicevska2|Inga Moročko-Bičevska]] 
-Expert reviewer: **WANTED!**+
 ===== Pathogen: //Xanthomonas euvesicatoria// pv. //euvesicatoria// ===== ===== Pathogen: //Xanthomonas euvesicatoria// pv. //euvesicatoria// =====
  
Line 44: Line 44:
 === Brief description === === Brief description ===
  
-The two paralogs in tomato, //SlBs5// and //SlBs5L//, are homologs of the pepper //Cabs5// resistance gene (Ortega //et al.//, 2024). The double gene knockouts provided some resistance (fewer / milder symptoms, reduced bacterial growth) against **//X. euvesicatoria// pv. //euvesicatoria//**  , **//X. euvesicatoria// pv. //perforans//**  , and **//X. hortorum// pv. //gardneri//**  (Ortega //et al.//, 2024).+The two paralogs in tomato, //SlBs5// and //SlBs5L//, are homologs of the pepper //Cabs5// resistance gene (Ortega //et al.//, 2024). The double gene knockouts provided some resistance (fewer / milder symptoms, reduced bacterial growth) against **//X. euvesicatoria// pv. //euvesicatoria//**, **//X. euvesicatoria// pv. //perforans//**, and **//X. hortorum// pv. //gardneri//** (Ortega //et al.//, 2024).
  
 ---- ----
Line 119: Line 119:
 === Synonyms === === Synonyms ===
  
-(possibly allelic to //Rx<sub>LA1589</sub> // and //Xv3//) (Zhao //et al//., 2015).+(possibly allelic to //Rx<sub>LA1589</sub>// and //Xv3//) (Zhao //et al//., 2015).
 === Source === === Source ===
  
Line 179: Line 179:
 === Synonyms === === Synonyms ===
  
-(possibly allelic to //Rx4// and //Rx<sub>LA1589</sub> //) (Zhao //et al//., 2015).+(possibly allelic to //Rx4// and //Rx<sub>LA1589</sub>//) (Zhao //et al//., 2015).
 === Source === === Source ===
  
Line 219: Line 219:
 ===== References ===== ===== References =====
  
-Astua-Monge G, Minsavage GV, Stall RE, Vallejos CE, Davis MJ, Jones JB (2000). //Xv4//-//avrxv4//: a new gene-for-gene interaction identified between //Xanthomonas//// campestris// pv. //vesicatoria// race T3 and the wild tomato relative //Lycopersicon pennellii//. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 13: 1346-1355. DOI: [[https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI.2000.13.12.1346|10.1094/MPMI.2000.13.12.1346]]+Astua-Monge G, Minsavage GV, Stall RE, Vallejos CE, Davis MJ, Jones JB (2000). //Xv4//-//avrxv4//: a new gene-for-gene interaction identified between //Xanthomonas campestris// pv. //vesicatoria// race T3 and the wild tomato relative //Lycopersicon pennellii//. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 13: 1346-1355. DOI: [[https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI.2000.13.12.1346|10.1094/MPMI.2000.13.12.1346]]
  
 Cook AA, Stall RE (1963). Inheritance of resistance in pepper to bacterial spot. Phytopathology 53: 1060-1062. Cook AA, Stall RE (1963). Inheritance of resistance in pepper to bacterial spot. Phytopathology 53: 1060-1062.
plant/tomato.1722955913.txt.gz · Last modified: 2024/08/06 15:51 by rkoebnik