This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
plant:tomato [2024/07/30 10:20] – [Resistance gene: //bs5// (CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout)] rkoebnik | plant:tomato [2025/02/03 22:38] (current) – jfpothier | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | ====== Tomato (//Solanum lycopersicum// | + | ====== |
Author: [[https:// | Author: [[https:// | ||
- | Internal reviewer: [[https:// | + | Internal reviewer: [[https:// |
- | Expert reviewer: **WANTED!** | + | |
===== Pathogen: // | ===== Pathogen: // | ||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
=== Brief description === | === Brief description === | ||
- | The two paralogs in tomato, //SlBs5// and //SlBs5L//, are homologs of the pepper //Cabs5// resistance gene (Ortega //et al.//, 2024). The double gene knockouts provided some resistance (fewer / milder symptoms, reduced bacterial growth) against **//X. euvesicatoria// | + | The two paralogs in tomato, //SlBs5// and //SlBs5L//, are homologs of the pepper //Cabs5// resistance gene (Ortega //et al.//, 2024). The double gene knockouts provided some resistance (fewer / milder symptoms, reduced bacterial growth) against **//X. euvesicatoria// |
---- | ---- | ||
Line 119: | Line 119: | ||
=== Synonyms === | === Synonyms === | ||
- | (possibly allelic to // | + | (possibly allelic to // |
=== Source === | === Source === | ||
Line 179: | Line 179: | ||
=== Synonyms === | === Synonyms === | ||
- | (possibly allelic to //Rx4// and // | + | (possibly allelic to //Rx4// and // |
=== Source === | === Source === | ||
Line 219: | Line 219: | ||
===== References ===== | ===== References ===== | ||
- | Astua-Monge G, Minsavage GV, Stall RE, Vallejos CE, Davis MJ, Jones JB (2000). // | + | Astua-Monge G, Minsavage GV, Stall RE, Vallejos CE, Davis MJ, Jones JB (2000). // |
Cook AA, Stall RE (1963). Inheritance of resistance in pepper to bacterial spot. Phytopathology 53: 1060-1062. | Cook AA, Stall RE (1963). Inheritance of resistance in pepper to bacterial spot. Phytopathology 53: 1060-1062. | ||
Horvath DM, Stall RE, Jones JB, Pauly MH, Vallad GE, Dahlbeck D, Staskawicz BJ, Scott JW (2012). Transgenic resistance confers effective field level control of bacterial spot disease in tomato. PLoS One 7: e42036. DOI: [[https:// | Horvath DM, Stall RE, Jones JB, Pauly MH, Vallad GE, Dahlbeck D, Staskawicz BJ, Scott JW (2012). Transgenic resistance confers effective field level control of bacterial spot disease in tomato. PLoS One 7: e42036. DOI: [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | Ortega A, Seong K, Schultink A, de Toledo Thomazella DP, Seo E, Zhang E, Pham J, Cho MJ, Dahlbeck D, Warren J, Minsavage GV, Jones JB, Sierra-Orozco E, Hutton SF, Staskawicz B (2024). CRISPR/ | ||
Pei C, Wang H, Zhang J, Wang Y, Francis DM, Yang W (2012). Fine mapping and analysis of a candidate gene in tomato accession PI128216 conferring hypersensitive resistance to bacterial spot race T3. Theor. Appl. Genet. 124: 533-542. DOI: [[https:// | Pei C, Wang H, Zhang J, Wang Y, Francis DM, Yang W (2012). Fine mapping and analysis of a candidate gene in tomato accession PI128216 conferring hypersensitive resistance to bacterial spot race T3. Theor. Appl. Genet. 124: 533-542. DOI: [[https:// | ||
Line 266: | Line 268: | ||
Wang Y, Zhang Y, Gao Z, Yang W (2018). Breeding for resistance to tomato bacterial diseases in China: challenges and prospects. Horticultural Plant J. 4: 193–207. DOI: [[https:// | Wang Y, Zhang Y, Gao Z, Yang W (2018). Breeding for resistance to tomato bacterial diseases in China: challenges and prospects. Horticultural Plant J. 4: 193–207. DOI: [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Acknowledgements ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | This fact sheet is based upon work from COST Action CA16107 EuroXanth, supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology). | ||