This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
bacteria:t3e:xops [2020/06/18 11:50] – [XopS] fernando_tavares | bacteria:t3e:xops [2025/02/21 13:37] (current) – [Biological function] rkoebnik | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | ====== XopS ====== | + | ====== |
- | Author: | + | Author: |
- | Internal reviewer: | + | Internal reviewer: |
- | Expert reviewer: | + | Expert reviewer: |
Class: XopS\\ | Class: XopS\\ | ||
Family: XopS\\ | Family: XopS\\ | ||
- | Prototype: | + | Prototype: |
- | RefSeq ID: -\\ | + | GenBank ID: [[https:// |
+ | RefSeq ID: [[https:// | ||
3D structure: Unknown | 3D structure: Unknown | ||
Line 14: | Line 15: | ||
=== How discovered? === | === How discovered? === | ||
- | XopS was discovered by sequence comparions, mutant and overexpression studies (Schulze //et al//., 2012). Mutant and overexpression studies revealed that XopB and XopS contribute to disease symptoms and bacterial growth, and suppress plant defense gene expression. | ||
+ | The //xopS// gene was identified as a candidate type III effector (T3E) by the presence of a plant-induced promoter (PIP) box, a lower G+C content suggesting acquisition by HGT, and co-expression with other T3E genes (Schulze //et al.//, 2012). Deficient mutants and overexpression studies revealed that XopB and XopS contribute to disease symptoms and bacterial growth, and suppress plant defense gene expression (Schulze //et al.//, 2012). | ||
=== (Experimental) evidence for being a T3E === | === (Experimental) evidence for being a T3E === | ||
- | For expression in Xcv, //xopS// was amplified from strain 85-10 and cloned into the Golden Gate‐compatible expression vector pBRM (Schulze //et al//., 2012). To generate // | ||
+ | Type III secretion (T3S) assays of XopS-AvrBs3Δ2 fusion proteins indicated that XopS is secreted and translocated into the plant cells through T3S, inducing HR in Bs3 resistant pepper leaves. Further supporting the identify of XopS as a T3E, it was shown that deletion mutants (Δ// | ||
+ | |||
+ | For expression in //X. campestris// | ||
=== Regulation === | === Regulation === | ||
- | HrpG- and HrpX-dependent co-regulation with the T3S system (Schulze //et al//., 2012). Presence of a PIP and -10 box (TTCGB‐N< | ||
+ | HrpG- and HrpX-dependent co-regulation with the T3S system (Schulze //et al//., 2012). Presence of a PIP and -10 box (TTCGB‐N< | ||
=== Phenotypes === | === Phenotypes === | ||
- | To study the contribution of the T3Es to bacterial virulence, the effector gene was individually deleted in Xcv strain 85‐10, and the mutant was inoculated into leaves of susceptible ECW pepper plants. In addition, induction of the HR in pepper ECW‐10R was analyzed, which is based on the recognition of the T3E AvrBs1 by the Bs1 resistance gene (Schulze //et al//., 2012). Deletion of //xopB// or //xopS// led to significantly reduced disease symptoms, whereas the HR induction was not impaired. The mutant phenotypes of 85-10ΔxopB and 85-10ΔxopS were complemented by ectopic expression of the respective effector gene, suggesting that reduced virulence was not caused by polar effects of the deletions on downstream genes. Although the growth of both individual effector mutants in ECW plants did not differ significantly from that of the wild‐type strain), multiplication of an 85‐10ΔxopBΔxopS double mutant was reduced significantly, | ||
+ | To study the contribution of the T3Es to bacterial virulence, the effector gene was individually deleted in //Xcv// strain 85‐10, and the mutant was inoculated into leaves of susceptible ECW pepper plants. In addition, induction of the HR in pepper ECW‐10R was analyzed, which is based on the recognition of the T3E AvrBs1 by the Bs1 resistance gene (Schulze //et al//., 2012). Schulze et al. 2012 studied XopS along with XopB in their study. Deletion of //xopB// or //xopS// led to significantly reduced disease symptoms, whereas the HR induction was not impaired. The mutant phenotypes of 85-10Δ// | ||
+ | |||
+ | XopS< | ||
=== Localization === | === Localization === | ||
- | Unknown. | ||
+ | A XopS-GFP fusion has a nucleo-cytoplasmic distribution on epidermal cells of //N. benthamiana// | ||
=== Enzymatic function === | === Enzymatic function === | ||
+ | |||
Unknown. | Unknown. | ||
=== Interaction partners === | === Interaction partners === | ||
- | Unknown. | + | |
+ | XopS< | ||
===== Conservation ===== | ===== Conservation ===== | ||
=== In xanthomonads === | === In xanthomonads === | ||
- | Yes (//e.g.//, // | ||
+ | Yes (//e.g.//, // | ||
=== In other plant pathogens/ | === In other plant pathogens/ | ||
- | ? | + | |
+ | Unknown | ||
===== References ===== | ===== References ===== | ||
- | Barak JG, Vancheva T, Lefeuvre P, Jones JB, Timilsina S, Minsavage GV, Vallad GE, Koebnik R (2014). Whole-genome sequences of // | + | Barak JD, Vancheva T, Lefeuvre P, Jones JB, Timilsina S, Minsavage GV, Vallad GE, Koebnik R (2016). Whole-genome sequences of // |
+ | |||
+ | Fonseca NP, Patané JSL, Varani AM, Felestrino EB, Caneschi WL, Sanchez AB, Cordeiro IF, Lemes CGC, Assis RAB, Garcia CCM, Belasque Jr. J, Martins Jr J, Facincani AP, Ferreira RM, Jaciani FJ, Almeida NF, Ferro JA, Moreira LM, Setubal JC (2019). Analyses of seven new genomes of // | ||
+ | |||
+ | Raffeiner M, Üstün S, Guerra T, Spinti D, Fitzner M, Sonnewald S, Baldermann S, Börnke F (2022). The // | ||
+ | |||
+ | Schulze S, Kay S, Büttner D, Egler M, Eschen-Lippold L, Hause G, Krüger A, Lee J, Müller O, Scheel D, Szczesny R, Thieme F, Bonas U (2012). Analysis of new type III effectors from // | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Acknowledgements ===== | ||
- | Schulze S, Kay S, Büttner D, Egler M, Eschen-Lippold L, Hause G, Krüger A, Lee J, Müller O, Scheel D, Szczesny R, Thieme F, Bonas U (2012). Analysis of new type III effectors from // | + | This fact sheet is based upon work from COST Action CA16107 EuroXanth, supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology). |