This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
bacteria:t3e:xopr [2025/02/24 10:39] – [Biological function] rkoebnik | bacteria:t3e:xopr [2025/07/28 15:17] (current) – [Biological function] rkoebnik | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Author: [[https:// | Author: [[https:// | ||
- | Reviewer: [[https:// | + | Reviewer: [[https:// |
Class: XopR\\ | Class: XopR\\ | ||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=== (Experimental) evidence for being a T3E === | === (Experimental) evidence for being a T3E === | ||
- | Evidence for T3SS-dependent secretion and translocation of XopR into plant cells was mainly based on calmodulin-dependent adenylate cyclase (Cya) reporter assays of fusion proteins (Furutani //et al.//, 2009). XopR< | + | Evidence for T3SS-dependent secretion and translocation of XopR into plant cells was mainly based on calmodulin-dependent adenylate cyclase (Cya) reporter assays of fusion proteins (Furutani //et al.//, 2009). XopR< |
=== Regulation === | === Regulation === | ||
- | Functional studies using // | + | Functional studies using // |
qRT-PCR revealed that transcript levels of 15 out of 18 tested non-TAL effector genes (as well as the regulatory genes //hrpG// and //hrpX//) were significantly reduced in the //Xoo// Δ//xrvC// mutant compared with those in the wild-type strain PXO99< | qRT-PCR revealed that transcript levels of 15 out of 18 tested non-TAL effector genes (as well as the regulatory genes //hrpG// and //hrpX//) were significantly reduced in the //Xoo// Δ//xrvC// mutant compared with those in the wild-type strain PXO99< | ||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
In the last few years a comprehensive body of experimental evidence has been gathered supporting a multiple action of XopR in hampering host plant defenses, namely by fostering bacterial growth //in planta//, and suppressing pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMP) triggered host plant immunity (PTI) (Akimoto-Tomiyama //et al.//, 2012; Wang //et al.//, 2016; Medina //et al.//, 2018; Verma //et al.//, 2018; Verma //et al.//, 2019). | In the last few years a comprehensive body of experimental evidence has been gathered supporting a multiple action of XopR in hampering host plant defenses, namely by fostering bacterial growth //in planta//, and suppressing pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMP) triggered host plant immunity (PTI) (Akimoto-Tomiyama //et al.//, 2012; Wang //et al.//, 2016; Medina //et al.//, 2018; Verma //et al.//, 2018; Verma //et al.//, 2019). | ||
- | A //xopR// deletion mutant in the Chinese //Xoo// strain 13751 showed a significant reduction in virulence in hybrid rice cv. Teyou63 compared to the wild type (Zhao //et al.//, 2013). However, the growth of the mutant in host plant rice was not affected. These results indicated that xopR was required for full virulence of Xoo strain 13751 by inducing rice disease tolerance (Zhao //et al.//, 2013). | + | A //xopR// deletion mutant in the Chinese //Xoo// strain 13751 showed a significant reduction in virulence in hybrid rice cv. Teyou63 compared to the wild type (Zhao //et al.//, 2013). However, the growth of the mutant in host plant rice was not affected. These results indicated that //xopR// was required for full virulence of //Xoo// strain 13751 by inducing rice disease tolerance (Zhao //et al.//, 2013). |
- | Later studies suggested that XopR suppress PAMP-triggered stomatal closure in transgenic // | + | Later studies suggested that XopR suppress PAMP-triggered stomatal closure in transgenic // |
=== Localization === | === Localization === | ||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
Yes (e.g. //X. arboricola, X. axonopodis//, | Yes (e.g. //X. arboricola, X. axonopodis//, | ||
+ | |||
=== In other plant pathogens/ | === In other plant pathogens/ | ||