This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
bacteria:t3e:xopn [2023/10/02 21:28] – [XopN] rkoebnik | bacteria:t3e:xopn [2025/07/24 22:46] (current) – jfpothier | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | ====== XopN ====== | + | ====== |
Author: [[https:// | Author: [[https:// | ||
Internal reviewer: [[https:// | Internal reviewer: [[https:// | ||
- | Expert reviewer: **WANTED!** | ||
Class: XopN\\ | Class: XopN\\ | ||
Line 17: | Line 16: | ||
XopN was identified in a genetic screen, using a Tn// | XopN was identified in a genetic screen, using a Tn// | ||
+ | |||
=== (Experimental) evidence for being a T3E === | === (Experimental) evidence for being a T3E === | ||
- | Type III-dependent secretion was confirmed using a calmodulin-dependent adenylate cyclase reporter assay, with a Δ//hrpF// mutant strain serving as negative control (Roden //et al.//, 2004). | + | Type III-dependent secretion was confirmed using a calmodulin-dependent adenylate cyclase reporter assay, with a Δ//hrpF// mutant strain serving as negative control (Roden //et al.//, 2004). |
=== Regulation === | === Regulation === | ||
Start codon of //xopN// was found downstream of a conserved cis-regulatory element, the plant-inducible promoter (PIP) box (TTCGG-N15-TTCTG). //xopN// is regulated by //hrpX// and //hrpG// genes (Jiang //et al//., 2008; Cheong //et al//., 2013). | Start codon of //xopN// was found downstream of a conserved cis-regulatory element, the plant-inducible promoter (PIP) box (TTCGG-N15-TTCTG). //xopN// is regulated by //hrpX// and //hrpG// genes (Jiang //et al//., 2008; Cheong //et al//., 2013). | ||
- | qRT-PCR revealed that transcript levels of 15 out of 18 tested non-TAL effector genes (as well as the regulatory genes //hrpG// and //hrpX//) were significantly reduced in the // | + | qRT-PCR revealed that transcript levels of 15 out of 18 tested non-TAL effector genes (as well as the regulatory genes //hrpG// and //hrpX//) were significantly reduced in the // |
=== Phenotypes === | === Phenotypes === | ||
- | * XopN< | + | * XopN< |
- | * Its homolog XopN < | + | * Its homolog XopN < |
- | * XopN has been shown to play a role in host defence systems causing the reduction of PAMP-triggered immune responses and reduce the callose deposition in the host tissue. Moreover the deletion of // | + | * XopN has been shown to play a role in host defence systems causing the reduction of PAMP-triggered immune responses and reduce the callose deposition in the host tissue. Moreover the deletion of //xopN// open reading frame (ORF) reduced the //Xcv// strain virulence exhibited by lower bacterial spot symptoms occurrence (Kim //et al//., 2009). |
* The role of XopN in X. oryzae pv. oryzae is dependent on leaf stage (Cheong et al., 2013). | * The role of XopN in X. oryzae pv. oryzae is dependent on leaf stage (Cheong et al., 2013). | ||
- | * XopN has been shown to be required for maximal pathogenicity of //X. axonopodis// | + | * XopN has been shown to be required for maximal pathogenicity of //X. axonopodis// |
- | * A Δ// | + | * A Δ// |
- | * // | + | * // |
- | * XopN and AvrBS2 were shown to significantly contribute to virulence of //X. oryzae// | + | * XopN and AvrBS2 were shown to significantly contribute to virulence of //X. oryzae// pv. // |
=== Localization === | === Localization === | ||
Line 42: | Line 44: | ||
=== Enzymatic function === | === Enzymatic function === | ||
- | XopN binds TARK1, a tomato atypical receptor kinase required for PTI. Taylor //et al.// (2012) showed that XopN promotes TARK1/TFT1 complex formation //in vitro// | + | XopN binds TARK1, a tomato atypical receptor kinase required for PTI. Taylor //et al.// (2012) showed that XopN promotes TARK1/TFT1 complex formation //in vitro// and //in planta// by functioning as a molecular scaffold.TFT proteins are involved in immune signaling during //X. euvesicatoria// |
Three effectors (XopZ, XopN and XopV) were shown to be able to supress the peptidoglycan-triggered MAPK activation and a triple mutant of Xoo lacking these genes showed additively reduced virulence (Long et al., 2018). | Three effectors (XopZ, XopN and XopV) were shown to be able to supress the peptidoglycan-triggered MAPK activation and a triple mutant of Xoo lacking these genes showed additively reduced virulence (Long et al., 2018). | ||
Line 50: | Line 52: | ||
XopN interact with two types of proteins in tomato: Tomato Atypical Receptor-like Kinase1 (TARK1) and four Tomato Fourteen-Three-Three isoforms (TFT1, TFT3, TFT5, and TFT6) (Kim //et al//., 2009). XopN interacts with the tomato 14-3-3 isoform TFT1 that functions in PTI and is a XopN virulence target (Taylor //et al.//, 2012). | XopN interact with two types of proteins in tomato: Tomato Atypical Receptor-like Kinase1 (TARK1) and four Tomato Fourteen-Three-Three isoforms (TFT1, TFT3, TFT5, and TFT6) (Kim //et al//., 2009). XopN interacts with the tomato 14-3-3 isoform TFT1 that functions in PTI and is a XopN virulence target (Taylor //et al.//, 2012). | ||
- | Two rice proteins, OsVOZ2 and a putative thiamine synthase (OsXNP) were identified as targets of XopN< | + | Two rice proteins, OsVOZ2 and a putative thiamine synthase (OsXNP) were identified as targets of XopN< |
===== Conservation ===== | ===== Conservation ===== | ||
Line 56: | Line 58: | ||
=== In xanthomonads === | === In xanthomonads === | ||
- | Yes (//e.g.//, //X. axonopodis//, | + | Yes (//e.g.//, //X. axonopodis//, |
=== In other plant pathogens/ | === In other plant pathogens/ | ||
- | Yes (//e.g.//, // | + | Yes (//e.g.//, // |
===== References ===== | ===== References ===== | ||
Line 90: | Line 92: | ||
Roden JA, Belt B, Ross JB, Tachibana T, Vargas J, Mudgett MB (2004). A genetic screen to isolate type III effectors translocated into pepper cells during // | Roden JA, Belt B, Ross JB, Tachibana T, Vargas J, Mudgett MB (2004). A genetic screen to isolate type III effectors translocated into pepper cells during // | ||
- | Sinha D, Gupta MK, Patel HK, Ranjan A, Sonti RV (2013). Cell wall degrading enzyme induced rice innate immune responses are suppressed by the type 3 secretion system effectors XopN, XopQ, XopX and XopZ of // | + | Sinha D, Gupta MK, Patel HK, Ranjan A, Sonti RV (2013). Cell wall degrading enzyme induced rice innate immune responses are suppressed by the type 3 secretion system effectors XopN, XopQ, XopX and XopZ of // |
Taylor KW, Kim JG, Su XB, Aakre CD, Roden JA, Adams CM, Mudgett MB (2012). Tomato TFT1 is required for PAMP-triggered immunity and mutations that prevent T3S effector XopN from binding to TFT1 attenuate // | Taylor KW, Kim JG, Su XB, Aakre CD, Roden JA, Adams CM, Mudgett MB (2012). Tomato TFT1 is required for PAMP-triggered immunity and mutations that prevent T3S effector XopN from binding to TFT1 attenuate // | ||
+ | |||
+ | Zhao S, Mo WL, Wu F, Tang W, Tang JL, Szurek B, Verdier V, Koebnik R, Feng JX (2013). Identification of non-TAL effectors in // | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Acknowledgements ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | This fact sheet is based upon work from COST Action CA16107 EuroXanth, supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology). | ||