User Tools

Site Tools


bacteria:t3e:xopj7

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
bacteria:t3e:xopj7 [2025/07/24 17:10] – [Biological function] rkoebnikbacteria:t3e:xopj7 [2025/07/24 23:28] (current) jfpothier
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 Author: Anna Passelergue\\ Author: Anna Passelergue\\
-Internal reviewer: [[https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ralf_Koebnik|Ralf Koebnik]]+Internal reviewer: [[https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ralf_Koebnik|Ralf Koebnik]]\\
  
 Class: XopJ\\ Class: XopJ\\
Line 16: Line 16:
  
 XopJ7 was discovered as an ORF that is encoded downstream of a PIP box and a properly spaced ‐10 promoter motif (TTCGB‐N<sub>15</sub> ‐TTCGB‐N<sub>30–32</sub> ‐YANNNT) (Passelergue, 2025). Additional evidence came from the presence of conserved myristoylation and palmitoylation signals (Nimchuk //et al.//, 2000; Thieme //et al.//, 2007), which were in frame with the ORF. Based on this observation, the translation initiation codon is likely 104 codons upstream of the annotated codon for the locus E4A48_RS06415. XopJ7 was discovered as an ORF that is encoded downstream of a PIP box and a properly spaced ‐10 promoter motif (TTCGB‐N<sub>15</sub> ‐TTCGB‐N<sub>30–32</sub> ‐YANNNT) (Passelergue, 2025). Additional evidence came from the presence of conserved myristoylation and palmitoylation signals (Nimchuk //et al.//, 2000; Thieme //et al.//, 2007), which were in frame with the ORF. Based on this observation, the translation initiation codon is likely 104 codons upstream of the annotated codon for the locus E4A48_RS06415.
 +
 === (Experimental) evidence for being a T3E === === (Experimental) evidence for being a T3E ===
  
 XopJ7 was shown to have a functional type III secretion signal using a reporter fusion with AvrBs1 (Zhao //et al.//, 2013). XopJ7 was shown to have a functional type III secretion signal using a reporter fusion with AvrBs1 (Zhao //et al.//, 2013).
 +
 === Regulation === === Regulation ===
  
 The presence of a PIP box and a properly spaced ‐10 promoter motif (TTCGB‐N<sub>15</sub> ‐TTCGB‐N<sub>30–32</sub> ‐YANNNT) suggests that the //xopJ7// gene is under control of HrpG and HrpX (Wengelnik & Bonas, 1996; Wengelnik //et al.//, 1996; Koebnik //et al.//, 2006). The presence of a PIP box and a properly spaced ‐10 promoter motif (TTCGB‐N<sub>15</sub> ‐TTCGB‐N<sub>30–32</sub> ‐YANNNT) suggests that the //xopJ7// gene is under control of HrpG and HrpX (Wengelnik & Bonas, 1996; Wengelnik //et al.//, 1996; Koebnik //et al.//, 2006).
 +
 === Phenotypes === === Phenotypes ===
  
Line 42: Line 45:
  
 Yes (//e.g.//, //X. euvesicatoria//, //X. campestris//, //X. hortorum//). Yes (//e.g.//, //X. euvesicatoria//, //X. campestris//, //X. hortorum//).
-=== In other plant pathogens/symbionts ===+= 
 +== In other plant pathogens/symbionts ===
  
 Yes (e.g., //Acidovorax/////Paracidovorax// ssp., //Burkholderia/////Paraburkholderia// ssp; remote homologs in //Ralstonia// ssp.]. Yes (e.g., //Acidovorax/////Paracidovorax// ssp., //Burkholderia/////Paraburkholderia// ssp; remote homologs in //Ralstonia// ssp.].
bacteria/t3e/xopj7.txt · Last modified: 2025/07/24 23:28 by jfpothier