This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
bacteria:t3e:xopj2 [2024/11/04 12:02] – [Conservation] rkoebnik | bacteria:t3e:xopj2 [2025/02/13 11:40] (current) – jfpothier | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
=== Phenotypes === | === Phenotypes === | ||
- | * AvrBsT was found to suppress the hypersensitive response (HR) that is elicited by the effector protein AvrBs1 from // | + | * AvrBsT was found to suppress the hypersensitive response (HR) that is elicited by the effector protein AvrBs1 from //Xee// in resistant pepper plants. HR suppression occurs inside the plant cell and depends on a conserved predicted catalytic residue of AvrBsT (Szczesny //et al//., 2010). |
* AvrBsT was found to act as a virulence factor in tomato plants (Kim //et al//., 2010). | * AvrBsT was found to act as a virulence factor in tomato plants (Kim //et al//., 2010). | ||
- | * Growth of // | + | * Growth of //Xee// strain Ds1 ectopically expressing //avrBsT// was significantly enhanced in tomato leaves, whereas growth of //Xee// strain Bv5-4a // |
- | * AvrBsT also significantly compromised callose deposition and defense-marker gene expression in tomato plants when inoculating // | + | * AvrBsT also significantly compromised callose deposition and defense-marker gene expression in tomato plants when inoculating //Xee// at high titer (Kim //et al//., 2010). |
- | * One out of 71 // | + | * One out of 71 // |
- | * Resistance in Pi-0 was found to be caused by a recessive mutation predicted to inactivate a carboxylesterase known to hydrolyze lysophospholipids and acylated proteins in eukaryotes. Transgenic Pi-0 plants expressing the wild-type allele from the //A. thaliana// | + | * Resistance in Pi-0 was found to be caused by a recessive mutation predicted to inactivate a carboxylesterase known to hydrolyze lysophospholipids and acylated proteins in eukaryotes. Transgenic Pi-0 plants expressing the wild-type allele from the //A. thaliana// ecotype Columbia were susceptible to //Pst// DC3000 AvrRpt2-AvrBsT-HA infection. These data indicated that the carboxylesterase inhibits AvrBsT-triggered phenotypes in // |
- | * It was later shown that Pi-0 leaves infected with // | + | * It was later shown that Pi-0 leaves infected with //Pst// DC3000 expressing AvrBsT accumulated higher levels of phosphatidic acid (PA) compared to leaves infected with //Pst// DC3000. Phospholipase D (PLD) activity was required for high PA levels and AvrBsT-dependent HR in Pi-0. Overexpression of SOBER1 in Pi-0 reduced PA levels and inhibited HR. These data implicated PA, phosphatidylcholine (PC) and lysophosphatidylcholine (LysoPC) as potential SOBER1 substrates. Recombinant His< |
- | * Transgenic // | + | * Transgenic // |
- | * Phylogenomics revealed that a host-range expansion of //X. euvesicatoria// | + | * Phylogenomics revealed that a host-range expansion of //X. euvesicatoria// |
- | * Later, AvrBsT was found to contribute to fitness of // | + | * Later, AvrBsT was found to contribute to fitness of //Xep// on tomato plants under field conditions (Abrahamian //et al//., 2018). |
- | * A variant of the canonical XopJ2 (XopJ2a) with only 70% sequence identity, | + | * A variant of the canonical XopJ2 (XopJ2a) with only 70% sequence identity, XopJ2b, triggers a HR when translocated into pepper cells (Sharma |
=== Localization === | === Localization === | ||
- | Transient coexpression of // | + | Transient coexpression of // |
=== Enzymatic function === | === Enzymatic function === | ||
- | AvrBsT belongs to the YopJ family, members of which were shown to act as cysteine proteases containing a catalytic triad (His, Glu, Cys). It was shown that AvrBsT requires a functional protease catalytic core to trigger defense responses in resistant plant cells, suggesting that AvrBsT acts as a protease to disrupt immune signaling pathways (Orth //et al//., 2000). AvrBsT was later shown to possess acetyltransferase activity and acetylates ACIP1 (for // | + | AvrBsT belongs to the YopJ family, members of which were shown to act as cysteine proteases containing a catalytic triad (His, Glu, Cys). It was shown that AvrBsT requires a functional protease catalytic core to trigger defense responses in resistant plant cells, suggesting that AvrBsT acts as a protease to disrupt immune signaling pathways (Orth //et al//., 2000). AvrBsT was later shown to possess acetyltransferase activity and acetylates ACIP1 (for // |
=== Interaction partners === | === Interaction partners === | ||
Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
* Yeast two-hybrid based analyses identified a putative regulator of sugar metabolism, SNF1-related kinase 1 (SnRK1), as an interactor of AvrBsT (Szczesny //et al//., 2010). Gene silencing experiments revealed that SnRK1 is required for the induction of the AvrBs1-specific HR, which is suppressed by AvrBsT (Szczesny //et al//., 2010). Thus, SnRK1 may be involved in the AvrBsT-mediated suppression of the AvrBs1-specific HR (Szczesny //et al//., 2010). | * Yeast two-hybrid based analyses identified a putative regulator of sugar metabolism, SNF1-related kinase 1 (SnRK1), as an interactor of AvrBsT (Szczesny //et al//., 2010). Gene silencing experiments revealed that SnRK1 is required for the induction of the AvrBs1-specific HR, which is suppressed by AvrBsT (Szczesny //et al//., 2010). Thus, SnRK1 may be involved in the AvrBsT-mediated suppression of the AvrBs1-specific HR (Szczesny //et al//., 2010). | ||
* Later, the pepper SGT1 (for suppressor of the G2 allele of //skp1//) and PIK1 (for receptor-like cytoplasmic kinase1) were identified as host interactors of AvrBsT. SGT1 forms a heterotrimeric complex with both AvrBsT and PIK1 exclusively in the cytoplasm. PIK1 specifically phosphorylates SGT1 and AvrBsT in vitro. AvrBsT binding to SGT1 resulted in the inhibition of PIK1-mediated SGT1 phosphorylation and subsequent nuclear transport of the SGT1-PIK1 complex (Kim //et al//., 2014). | * Later, the pepper SGT1 (for suppressor of the G2 allele of //skp1//) and PIK1 (for receptor-like cytoplasmic kinase1) were identified as host interactors of AvrBsT. SGT1 forms a heterotrimeric complex with both AvrBsT and PIK1 exclusively in the cytoplasm. PIK1 specifically phosphorylates SGT1 and AvrBsT in vitro. AvrBsT binding to SGT1 resulted in the inhibition of PIK1-mediated SGT1 phosphorylation and subsequent nuclear transport of the SGT1-PIK1 complex (Kim //et al//., 2014). | ||
- | * Using a yeast two-hybrid screen, the pepper CaHSP70a was identified as another AvrBsT-interacting protein. Bimolecular fluorescence complementation and co-immunoprecipitation assays confirmed the specific interaction between CaHSP70a and AvrBsT //in planta// | + | * Using a yeast two-hybrid screen, the pepper CaHSP70a was identified as another AvrBsT-interacting protein. Bimolecular fluorescence complementation and co-immunoprecipitation assays confirmed the specific interaction between CaHSP70a and AvrBsT //in planta// (Kim //et al//., 2015a). |
- | * Using a yeast two-hybrid screen, the pepper aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 (CaALDH1) was identified as another AvrBsT-interacting protein. Bimolecular fluorescence complementation and co-immunoprecipitation assays confirmed the interaction between CaALDH1 and AvrBsT //in planta// | + | * Using a yeast two-hybrid screen, the pepper aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 (CaALDH1) was identified as another AvrBsT-interacting protein. Bimolecular fluorescence complementation and co-immunoprecipitation assays confirmed the interaction between CaALDH1 and AvrBsT //in planta// (Kim //et al//., 2015b). |
===== Conservation ===== | ===== Conservation ===== | ||
Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
Yes (// | Yes (// | ||
- | ===== ===== | ||
===== References ===== | ===== References ===== | ||
Line 101: | Line 100: | ||
Schwartz AR, Potnis N, Timilsina S, Wilson M, Patané J, Martins J Jr, Minsavage GV, Dahlbeck D, Akhunova A, Almeida N, Vallad GE, Barak JD, White FF, Miller SA, Ritchie D, Goss E, Bart RS, Setubal JC, Jones JB, Staskawicz BJ (2015). Phylogenomics of // | Schwartz AR, Potnis N, Timilsina S, Wilson M, Patané J, Martins J Jr, Minsavage GV, Dahlbeck D, Akhunova A, Almeida N, Vallad GE, Barak JD, White FF, Miller SA, Ritchie D, Goss E, Bart RS, Setubal JC, Jones JB, Staskawicz BJ (2015). Phylogenomics of // | ||
- | Sharma A, Iruegas-Bocardo F, Bibi S, Chen YC, Kim JG, Abrahamian P, Minsavage GV, Hurlbert JC, Vallad GE, Mudgett MB, Jones JB, Goss EM (2024). Multiple acquisitions of XopJ2 effectors in populations of // | + | Sharma A, Iruegas-Bocardo F, Bibi S, Chen YC, Kim JG, Abrahamian P, Minsavage GV, Hurlbert JC, Vallad GE, Mudgett MB, Jones JB, Goss EM (2024). Multiple acquisitions of XopJ2 effectors in populations of // |
Szczesny R, Büttner D, Escolar L, Schulze S, Seiferth A, Bonas U (2010). Suppression of the AvrBs1-specific hypersensitive response by the YopJ effector homolog AvrBsT from // | Szczesny R, Büttner D, Escolar L, Schulze S, Seiferth A, Bonas U (2010). Suppression of the AvrBs1-specific hypersensitive response by the YopJ effector homolog AvrBsT from // | ||
Line 107: | Line 106: | ||
===== Further reading ===== | ===== Further reading ===== | ||
- | Han SW, Hwang BK (2017). Molecular functions of // | + | Han SW, Hwang BK (2017). Molecular functions of // |
Timilsina S, Abrahamian P, Potnis N, Minsavage GV, White FF, Staskawicz BJ, Jones JB, Vallad GE, Goss EM (2016). Analysis of sequenced genomes of Xanthomonas perforans identifies candidate targets for resistance breeding in tomato. Phytopathology 106: 1097-1104. DOI: [[https:// | Timilsina S, Abrahamian P, Potnis N, Minsavage GV, White FF, Staskawicz BJ, Jones JB, Vallad GE, Goss EM (2016). Analysis of sequenced genomes of Xanthomonas perforans identifies candidate targets for resistance breeding in tomato. Phytopathology 106: 1097-1104. DOI: [[https:// |