This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
bacteria:t3e:xopd [2020/07/03 08:42] – rkoebnik | bacteria:t3e:xopd [2025/02/12 23:51] (current) – jfpothier | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | ====== XopD ====== | + | ====== |
Author: [[https:// | Author: [[https:// | ||
- | Internal reviewer: [[https:// | + | Internal reviewer: [[https:// |
- | Expert reviewer: FIXME | + | |
- | Class: XopD (Xanthomonas outer protein D)\\ | + | Class: XopD (//Xanthomonas// outer protein D)\\ |
- | Family: | + | Family: |
- | Prototype: | + | Prototype: |
- | RefSeq | + | GenBank |
- | 3D structure : [[https:// | + | GenBank ID: [[https:// |
+ | RefSeq ID: [[https:// | ||
+ | 3D structure: [[https:// | ||
===== Biological function ===== | ===== Biological function ===== | ||
Line 18: | Line 19: | ||
=== (Experimental) evidence for being a T3E === | === (Experimental) evidence for being a T3E === | ||
- | XopD is a desumoylating enzyme with strict specificity for its plant small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) substrates (Chosed //et al//., 2007). C-terminus of XopD (amino acids 322–520) shares primary sequence similarity with the C48 family of cysteine peptidases. In the XopD polypeptide, | + | XopD is a desumoylating enzyme with strict specificity for its plant small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) substrates (Chosed //et al//., 2007). C-terminus of XopD (amino acids 322–520) shares primary sequence similarity with the C48 family of cysteine peptidases |
- | Besides C-terminal SUMO protease domain (Chosed | + | Besides C-terminal SUMO protease domain (Hotson |
=== Regulation === | === Regulation === | ||
- | The //xopD// gene expression is induced in a //hrpG//- and // | + | The //xopD// gene expression is induced in a //hrpG//- and // |
=== Phenotypes === | === Phenotypes === | ||
XopD is a unique virulence factor that promotes tolerance to //Xcv// 85-10 in infected host leaves and affects bacteria miltiplication (Kim //et al//., 2008). It was found that delays the onset leaf chlorosis and necrosis, two phenotypes associated with pathogen-triggered immunity (PTI) activation (Kim //et al//., 2008). Delaying in tissue damages and lower chlorophyll loss corelate with reduced host defense transcription and reduced salicylic acid (SA) levels-plant defense hormone that limits the spread of pathogens in infected host plant. Moreover, expression of XopD //in planta// is sufficient to repress not only SA- but also jasmonic acid–induced gene transcription (Hotson //et al//., 2003; Kim //et al//., 2008; Kim //et al//., 2011). It was also shown that XopD highly induces the tomato transcription factor, bHLH132 (Kim //et al//., 2019). This induction is dependant of XopD SUMO protease activity. This sutdy has shown that is involved in both plant development and plant defense regulation and that silencing bHLH132 mRNA expression results in stuned tomato with enhanced susceptibility to //Xcv// infection. | XopD is a unique virulence factor that promotes tolerance to //Xcv// 85-10 in infected host leaves and affects bacteria miltiplication (Kim //et al//., 2008). It was found that delays the onset leaf chlorosis and necrosis, two phenotypes associated with pathogen-triggered immunity (PTI) activation (Kim //et al//., 2008). Delaying in tissue damages and lower chlorophyll loss corelate with reduced host defense transcription and reduced salicylic acid (SA) levels-plant defense hormone that limits the spread of pathogens in infected host plant. Moreover, expression of XopD //in planta// is sufficient to repress not only SA- but also jasmonic acid–induced gene transcription (Hotson //et al//., 2003; Kim //et al//., 2008; Kim //et al//., 2011). It was also shown that XopD highly induces the tomato transcription factor, bHLH132 (Kim //et al//., 2019). This induction is dependant of XopD SUMO protease activity. This sutdy has shown that is involved in both plant development and plant defense regulation and that silencing bHLH132 mRNA expression results in stuned tomato with enhanced susceptibility to //Xcv// infection. | ||
- | For instance, XcvΔ// | + | For instance, XcvΔ// |
Comparative analysis of the XopD effector family in other phytopathogenic bacteria revealed that so called XopD-like proteins presents differences in sequence and length of their N-terminal domains. This suggests that the N-terminal domain of XopD and XopD-like effectors might impart substrate and/or host specificity. | Comparative analysis of the XopD effector family in other phytopathogenic bacteria revealed that so called XopD-like proteins presents differences in sequence and length of their N-terminal domains. This suggests that the N-terminal domain of XopD and XopD-like effectors might impart substrate and/or host specificity. | ||
Line 35: | Line 36: | ||
=== Localization === | === Localization === | ||
- | XopD localizes to subnuclear foci. The N terminus of XopD is required for targeting the effector to the plant nucleus; C-terminal domain encodes a Cys protease that cleaves SUMO-conjugated proteins (Hotson //et al//., 2003; Kim //et al//., 2008)). | + | XopD localizes to subnuclear foci. The N terminus of XopD is required for targeting the effector to the plant nucleus; C-terminal domain encodes a Cys protease that cleaves SUMO-conjugated proteins (Hotson //et al//., 2003; Kim //et al//., 2008). |
=== Enzymatic function === | === Enzymatic function === | ||
- | Peptidase, isopeptidase or desumoylating enzyme (Hotson//et al//., 2003). | + | Peptidase, isopeptidase or desumoylating enzyme (Hotson //et al//., 2003). |
=== Interaction partners === | === Interaction partners === | ||
Line 47: | Line 48: | ||
=== In xanthomonads === | === In xanthomonads === | ||
- | Yes (e.g. // | + | Yes (//e.g.//, // |
=== In other plant pathogens/ | === In other plant pathogens/ | ||
Line 77: | Line 78: | ||
Ohta M, Matsui K, Hiratsu K, Shinshi H, Ohme-Takagi M (2001). Repression domains of class II ERF transcriptional repressors share an essential motif for active repression. Plant Cell 13: 1959-1968. DOI: [[https:// | Ohta M, Matsui K, Hiratsu K, Shinshi H, Ohme-Takagi M (2001). Repression domains of class II ERF transcriptional repressors share an essential motif for active repression. Plant Cell 13: 1959-1968. DOI: [[https:// | ||
- | Pruneda JN, Durkin CH, Geurink PP, Ovaa H, Santhanam B, Holden DW, Komander D. (2016). The molecular basis for ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like specificities in bacterial effector proteases. Mol. Cell 63: 261-276. DOI: [[https:// | + | Pruneda JN, Durkin CH, Geurink PP, Ovaa H, Santhanam B, Holden DW, Komander D (2016). The molecular basis for ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like specificities in bacterial effector proteases. Mol. Cell 63: 261-276. DOI: [[https:// |
Rawlings ND, Morton FR, Barrett AJ (2006). MEROPS: the peptidase database. Nucl. Acids Res. 34: D270-D272. DOI: [[https:// | Rawlings ND, Morton FR, Barrett AJ (2006). MEROPS: the peptidase database. Nucl. Acids Res. 34: D270-D272. DOI: [[https:// | ||
Tan CM, Li MY, Yang PY, Chang SH, Ho YP, Lin H, Deng WL, Yang JY (2015). // | Tan CM, Li MY, Yang PY, Chang SH, Ho YP, Lin H, Deng WL, Yang JY (2015). // | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Further reading ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Canonne J, Marino D, Noël LD, Arechaga I, Pichereaux C, Rossignol M, Roby D, Rivas S (2010). Detection and functional characterization of a 215 amino acid N-terminal extension in the // | ||
+ | |||
+ | Raffaele S, Rivas S (2013). Regulate and be regulated: integration of defense and other signals by the AtMYB30 transcription factor. Front. Plant Sci. 4: 98. DOI: [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | Tan L, Rong W, Luo H, Chen Y, He C (2014). The // | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Acknowledgements ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | This fact sheet is based upon work from COST Action CA16107 EuroXanth, supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology). | ||