EuroXanth DokuWiki

User Tools

Site Tools

Trace:
bacteria:t3e:xopd

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
bacteria:t3e:xopd [2020/07/01 09:20] – [References] rkoebnikbacteria:t3e:xopd [2025/02/12 23:51] (current) – jfpothier
Line 1: Line 1:
-====== XopD ======+====== The Type III Effector XopD from //Xanthomonas// ======
  
-Author: Monika Kaluzna\\ +Author: [[https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Monika_Kaluzna|Monika Kałużna]]\\ 
-Internal reviewer: Alice Boulanger\\ +Internal reviewer: [[https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Alice_Castaing|Alice Boulanger]]
-Expert reviewer: FIXME+
  
-Class: XopD (Xanthomonas outer protein D)\\ +Class: XopD (//Xanthomonas// outer protein D)\\ 
-Family: family C48 (Rawlings //et al//., 2006)\\ +Family: XopD\\ 
-Prototype: XopD (//Xanthomonas// outer protein D ; //Xanthomonas euvesicatoria// pv. //euvesicatoria// aka //Xanthomonas campestris// pv. //vescicatoria//; strain 85-10)\\ +Prototype: XCV0437 (//Xanthomonas euvesicatoria// pv. //euvesicatoria//, ex //Xanthomonas campestris// pv. //vesicatoria//; strain 85-10)\\ 
-RefSeq ID: [[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein/CAJ22068|CAJ22068]] (545 aa); [[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein/DAA34040|DAA34040]] (760 aa) new annotation\\ +GenBank ID: [[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein/CAJ22068.1|CAJ22068.1]] (545 aa; original but wrong structural annotation)\\ 
-3D structure : [[https://www.rcsb.org/structure/5JP3|5JP3]], Crystal structure available in (Chosed //et al//., 2007), [[http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore/jmol.do?structureId=2OIV&edMap=PO4|PDB-2OIV]]+GenBank ID: [[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein/DAA34040.1|DAA34040.1]] (760 aa; new structural annotation)\\ 
 +RefSeq ID: [[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein/WP_228949438.1|WP_228949438.1]] (760 aa; new structural annotation)\\ 
 +3D structure: [[https://www.rcsb.org/structure/2OIV|2OIV]], [[https://www.rcsb.org/structure/2OIX|2OIX]] (Chosed //et al//., 2007); [[https://www.rcsb.org/structure/5JP1|5JP1]], [[https://www.rcsb.org/structure/5JP3|5JP3]] (Pruneda //et al.//, 2016)
  
 ===== Biological function ===== ===== Biological function =====
Line 16: Line 17:
  
 XopD was discovered in a cDNA-AFLP screen and reverse transcription-PCR analyses (Noël //et al//., 2002). XopD was discovered in a cDNA-AFLP screen and reverse transcription-PCR analyses (Noël //et al//., 2002).
- 
 === (Experimental) evidence for being a T3E === === (Experimental) evidence for being a T3E ===
  
-XopD is a desumoylating enzyme with strict specificity for its plant small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) substrates (Chosed //et al//., 2007). C-terminus of XopD (amino acids 322–520) shares primary sequence similarity with the C48 family of cysteine peptidases. In the XopD polypeptide, amino acid positions 309–481 are most homologous to the C-terminal catalytic domain of the Ulp1 ubiquitin-like protease protein family, which is highly conserved (Hotson //et al//., 2003; Li & Hochstrasser, 1999). Unlike yeast Ulp1 which process a variety of SUMO substrates, XopD exhibits rigid SUMO substrate specificity, it will process only certain plant SUMOs, //i.e.// T-SUMO, //At//SUMO-1, and //At//SUMO-2 (Chosed //et al//., 2007). However, another study has shoxn that XopD shows a mixed activity, being a (tomato)-SUMO and Ubiquitin isopeptidase. The capacity to efficiently recognize both substrates suggest a large evolutionary pressure to become a multifunctionnal protease (Pruneda //et al//., 2016). +XopD is a desumoylating enzyme with strict specificity for its plant small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) substrates (Chosed //et al//., 2007). C-terminus of XopD (amino acids 322–520) shares primary sequence similarity with the C48 family of cysteine peptidases (Rawlings //et al//., 2006). In the XopD polypeptide, amino acid positions 309–481 are most homologous to the C-terminal catalytic domain of the Ulp1 ubiquitin-like protease protein family, which is highly conserved (Li & Hochstrasser, 1999; Hotson //et al//., 2003). Unlike yeast Ulp1 which process a variety of SUMO substrates, XopD exhibits rigid SUMO substrate specificity, it will process only certain plant SUMOs, //i.e.// T-SUMO, //At//SUMO-1, and //At//SUMO-2 (Chosed //et al//., 2007). However, another study has shoxn that XopD shows a mixed activity, being a (tomato)-SUMO and Ubiquitin isopeptidase. The capacity to efficiently recognize both substrates suggest a large evolutionary pressure to become a multifunctionnal protease (Pruneda //et al//., 2016).
- +
-Besides C-terminal SUMO protease domain (Chosed //et al//., 2007; Hotson //et al//., 2003), XopD has a unique N-terminal region with a host range determining non-specific DNA-binding domain (DBD) (Kim //et al//., 2011) and a central domain with two internal ERF-associated amphiphilic repression (EAR) motifs (L/FDLNL/FXP)(Ohta //et al//., 2001), which were found in plant repressors that regulate stress induced transcription. XopD might repress host transcription during //Xcv// infection (Ohta //et al//., 2001; Kim //et al//., 2011).+
  
 +Besides C-terminal SUMO protease domain (Hotson //et al//., 2003; Chosed //et al//., 2007), XopD has a unique N-terminal region with a host range determining non-specific DNA-binding domain (DBD) (Kim //et al//., 2011) and a central domain with two internal ERF-associated amphiphilic repression (EAR) motifs (L/FDLNL/FXP) (Ohta //et al//., 2001), which were found in plant repressors that regulate stress induced transcription. XopD might repress host transcription during //Xcv// infection (Ohta //et al//., 2001; Kim //et al//., 2011).
 === Regulation === === Regulation ===
  
-The //xopD// gene expression is induced in a //hrpG//- and //hrpX//-dependent manner (Noel //et al//., 2002). It was described that, XopD promoter does not contain a PIP box, but a //hrp// box, which is found in all //hrpL//-dependent promoters in //P.syringae// and //Erwinia// spp. (GGAACTNA-N13-CGACNNA; consensus: GGAACcNa-N13/14-cCACNNA) (Noel //et al//., 2002; Innes //et al//., 1993). However, after carefully inspected the intergenic region of the //Xanthomonas euvesicatoria// pv. //euvesicatoria// 85-10 genome (Xcv 85-10) between the //XCV0436// locus and the //xopD// locus for an alternative promoter and start site (Kim //et al//., 2011), identified a putative PIP box and ATG just downstream of the //XCV0436// locus. Using ATG as the putative start codon, the respective //xopD// ORF predicts a protein with 760 aa with a longer N-terminal domain (Kim //et al//., 2011). +The //xopD// gene expression is induced in a //hrpG//- and //hrpX//-dependent manner (Noël //et al//., 2002). It was described that, XopD promoter does not contain a PIP box, but a //hrp// box, which is found in all //hrpL//-dependent promoters in //P. syringae// and //Erwinia// spp. (GGAACTNA-N13-CGACNNA; consensus: GGAACcNa-N13/14-cCACNNA) (Noël //et al//., 2002; Innes //et al//., 1993). However, after carefully inspected the intergenic region of the //Xanthomonas euvesicatoria// pv. //euvesicatoria// 85-10 genome (Xcv 85-10) between the //XCV0436// locus and the //xopD// locus for an alternative promoter and start site (Kim //et al//., 2011), identified a putative PIP box and ATG just downstream of the //XCV0436// locus. Using ATG as the putative start codon, the respective //xopD// ORF predicts a protein with 760 aa with a longer N-terminal domain (Kim //et al//., 2011).
 === Phenotypes === === Phenotypes ===
  
 XopD is a unique virulence factor that promotes tolerance to //Xcv// 85-10 in infected host leaves and affects bacteria miltiplication (Kim //et al//., 2008). It was found that delays the onset leaf chlorosis and necrosis, two phenotypes associated with pathogen-triggered immunity (PTI) activation (Kim //et al//., 2008). Delaying in tissue damages and lower chlorophyll loss corelate with reduced host defense transcription and reduced salicylic acid (SA) levels-plant defense hormone that limits the spread of pathogens in infected host plant. Moreover, expression of XopD //in planta// is sufficient to repress not only SA- but also jasmonic acid–induced gene transcription (Hotson //et al//., 2003; Kim //et al//., 2008; Kim //et al//., 2011). It was also shown that XopD highly induces the tomato transcription factor, bHLH132 (Kim //et al//., 2019). This induction is dependant of XopD SUMO protease activity. This sutdy has shown that is involved in both plant development and plant defense regulation and that silencing bHLH132 mRNA expression results in stuned tomato with enhanced susceptibility to //Xcv// infection. XopD is a unique virulence factor that promotes tolerance to //Xcv// 85-10 in infected host leaves and affects bacteria miltiplication (Kim //et al//., 2008). It was found that delays the onset leaf chlorosis and necrosis, two phenotypes associated with pathogen-triggered immunity (PTI) activation (Kim //et al//., 2008). Delaying in tissue damages and lower chlorophyll loss corelate with reduced host defense transcription and reduced salicylic acid (SA) levels-plant defense hormone that limits the spread of pathogens in infected host plant. Moreover, expression of XopD //in planta// is sufficient to repress not only SA- but also jasmonic acid–induced gene transcription (Hotson //et al//., 2003; Kim //et al//., 2008; Kim //et al//., 2011). It was also shown that XopD highly induces the tomato transcription factor, bHLH132 (Kim //et al//., 2019). This induction is dependant of XopD SUMO protease activity. This sutdy has shown that is involved in both plant development and plant defense regulation and that silencing bHLH132 mRNA expression results in stuned tomato with enhanced susceptibility to //Xcv// infection.
  
-For instance, XcvΔ//xopD// mutants grow poorly in infected tomato leaves because defenses dependent from SA were not stifled (Kim //et al//., 2008). It is also known that XopD<sub>Xcv85-10</sub> directly interacts with tomato ethylene responsive transcription factor SlERF4. XopD desumoylates SlERF4 and suppress its activity in ethylene production, which is required for anti-Xcv ethylene stimulated immunity and symptom development (Kim //et al//., 2013). XopD<sub>XccB100</sub> from the// Xanthomonas campestris// pv. //campestris// (//Xcc//) strain B100 specifically interacts with MYB30 to suppress its activity in activating plant defense responses required for anti-//Xcc// immunity (Canonne //et al//., 2011).+For instance, XcvΔ//xopD// mutants grow poorly in infected tomato leaves because defenses dependent from SA were not stifled (Kim //et al//., 2008). It is also known that XopD<sub>Xcv85-10</sub> directly interacts with tomato ethylene responsive transcription factor SlERF4. XopD desumoylates SlERF4 and suppress its activity in ethylene production, which is required for anti-Xcv ethylene stimulated immunity and symptom development (Kim //et al//., 2013). XopD<sub>XccB100</sub> from the //Xanthomonas campestris// pv. //campestris// (//Xcc//) strain B100 specifically interacts with MYB30 to suppress its activity in activating plant defense responses required for anti-//Xcc// immunity (Canonne //et al//., 2011).
  
 Comparative analysis of the XopD effector family in other phytopathogenic bacteria revealed that so called XopD-like proteins presents differences in sequence and length of their N-terminal domains. This suggests that the N-terminal domain of XopD and XopD-like effectors might impart substrate and/or host specificity. Comparative analysis of the XopD effector family in other phytopathogenic bacteria revealed that so called XopD-like proteins presents differences in sequence and length of their N-terminal domains. This suggests that the N-terminal domain of XopD and XopD-like effectors might impart substrate and/or host specificity.
  
-Transgenic expression of XopD<sub>Xcc8004</sub> in //Arabidopsis// has shown an accumulation of host defense response in a SA-dependent way (Tan //et al.//, 2015). Another study showed that //psvA//<sub>Xcc8004</sub> and //psvA//<sub>XccATCC33913</sub> (Castaneda //et al//., 2005) are not required for //Xcc// virulence in their host plants. Moreover, XopD<sub>XccB100</sub>, although having high sequence similarity with XopD<sub>Xcv85–10</sub> except for the KAE-rich domain localized in N-terminal region (Canonne //et al//., 2012), was not required for //Xcc// B100 virulence in //Arabidopsis//, //N. benthamiana//, and radish. These findings suggest that XopD-like effectors are not important for //Xcc//-plant interactions (Kim //et al//., 2011). +Transgenic expression of XopD<sub>Xcc8004</sub> in //Arabidopsis// has shown an accumulation of host defense response in a SA-dependent way (Tan //et al.//, 2015). Another study showed that //psvA// <sub>Xcc8004</sub> and //psvA// <sub>XccATCC33913</sub> (Castaneda //et al//., 2005) are not required for //Xcc// virulence in their host plants. Moreover, XopD<sub>XccB100</sub>, although having high sequence similarity with XopD<sub>Xcv85–10</sub> except for the KAE-rich domain localized in N-terminal region (Canonne //et al//., 2012), was not required for //Xcc// B100 virulence in //Arabidopsis//, //N. benthamiana//, and radish. These findings suggest that XopD-like effectors are not important for //Xcc//-plant interactions (Kim //et al//., 2011).
 === Localization === === Localization ===
  
-XopD localizes to subnuclear foci. The N terminus of XopD is required for targeting the effector to the plant nucleus; C-terminal domain encodes a Cys protease that cleaves SUMO-conjugated proteins (Hotson //et al//., 2003; Kim //et al//., 2008)). +XopD localizes to subnuclear foci. The N terminus of XopD is required for targeting the effector to the plant nucleus; C-terminal domain encodes a Cys protease that cleaves SUMO-conjugated proteins (Hotson //et al//., 2003; Kim //et al//., 2008).
 === Enzymatic function === === Enzymatic function ===
  
-Peptidase, isopeptidase or desumoylating enzyme (Hotson//et al//., 2003). +Peptidase, isopeptidase or desumoylating enzyme (Hotson //et al//., 2003).
 === Interaction partners === === Interaction partners ===
  
Line 53: Line 48:
 === In xanthomonads === === In xanthomonads ===
  
-Yes (e.g. //Xanthomonas campestris// pv. //vesicatoria//, //X. campestris// pv. //campestris// (Kim //et al//., 2011). +Yes (//e.g.//, //Xanthomonas campestris// pv. //vesicatoria//, //X. campestris// pv. //campestris// (Kim //et al//., 2011).
 === In other plant pathogens/symbionts === === In other plant pathogens/symbionts ===
  
Line 84: Line 78:
 Ohta M, Matsui K, Hiratsu K, Shinshi H, Ohme-Takagi M (2001). Repression domains of class II ERF transcriptional repressors share an essential motif for active repression. Plant Cell 13: 1959-1968. DOI: [[https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.010127|10.1105/tpc.010127]] Ohta M, Matsui K, Hiratsu K, Shinshi H, Ohme-Takagi M (2001). Repression domains of class II ERF transcriptional repressors share an essential motif for active repression. Plant Cell 13: 1959-1968. DOI: [[https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.010127|10.1105/tpc.010127]]
  
-Pruneda JN, Durkin CH, Geurink PP, Ovaa H, Santhanam B, Holden DW, Komander D. (2016). The molecular basis for ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like specificities in bacterial effector proteases. Mol. Cell 63: 261-276. DOI: [[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2016.06.015|10.1016/j.molcel.2016.06.015]]+Pruneda JN, Durkin CH, Geurink PP, Ovaa H, Santhanam B, Holden DW, Komander D (2016). The molecular basis for ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like specificities in bacterial effector proteases. Mol. Cell 63: 261-276. DOI: [[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2016.06.015|10.1016/j.molcel.2016.06.015]]
  
 Rawlings ND, Morton FR, Barrett AJ (2006). MEROPS: the peptidase database. Nucl. Acids Res. 34: D270-D272. DOI: [[https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkj089|10.1093/nar/gkj089]] Rawlings ND, Morton FR, Barrett AJ (2006). MEROPS: the peptidase database. Nucl. Acids Res. 34: D270-D272. DOI: [[https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkj089|10.1093/nar/gkj089]]
  
 Tan CM, Li MY, Yang PY, Chang SH, Ho YP, Lin H, Deng WL, Yang JY (2015). //Arabidopsis// HFR1 is a potential nuclear substrate regulated by the //Xanthomonas// type III effector XopD<sub>//Xcc//8004</sub>. PLoS One 10: e0117067. DOI: [[http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0117067|10.1371/journal.pone.0117067]] Tan CM, Li MY, Yang PY, Chang SH, Ho YP, Lin H, Deng WL, Yang JY (2015). //Arabidopsis// HFR1 is a potential nuclear substrate regulated by the //Xanthomonas// type III effector XopD<sub>//Xcc//8004</sub>. PLoS One 10: e0117067. DOI: [[http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0117067|10.1371/journal.pone.0117067]]
 +
 +===== Further reading =====
 +
 +Canonne J, Marino D, Noël LD, Arechaga I, Pichereaux C, Rossignol M, Roby D, Rivas S (2010). Detection and functional characterization of a 215 amino acid N-terminal extension in the //Xanthomonas// type III effector XopD. PLoS One 5: e15773. DOI: [[https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015773|10.1371/journal.pone.0015773]]. **Retraction in: PLoS One (2018) 13: e0190773.** DOI: [[https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190773|10.1371/journal.pone.0190773 ]]
 +
 +Raffaele S, Rivas S (2013). Regulate and be regulated: integration of defense and other signals by the AtMYB30 transcription factor. Front. Plant Sci. 4: 98. DOI: [[https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00098|10.3389/fpls.2013.00098]]
 +
 +Tan L, Rong W, Luo H, Chen Y, He C (2014). The //Xanthomonas campestris// effector protein XopD<sub>Xcc8004</sub> triggers plant disease tolerance by targeting DELLA proteins. New Phytol. 204: 595-608. DOI: [[https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12918|10.1111/nph.12918]]
 +
 +===== Acknowledgements =====
 +
 +This fact sheet is based upon work from COST Action CA16107 EuroXanth, supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology).
  
bacteria/t3e/xopd.1593591600.txt.gz · Last modified: 2023/01/09 10:20 (external edit)

Page Tools

Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International
CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki