This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
bacteria:t3e:xopc [2024/08/06 14:06] – [XopC] rkoebnik | bacteria:t3e:xopc [2025/02/12 23:50] (current) – jfpothier | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | ====== The Type III Effector XopC from Xanthomonas ====== | + | ====== The Type III Effector XopC from //Xanthomonas// ====== |
Author: [[https:// | Author: [[https:// | ||
- | Internal reviewer: [[https:// | + | Internal reviewer: [[https:// |
- | Expert reviewer: **WANTED!** | + | |
Class: XopC\\ | Class: XopC\\ | ||
- | Family: XopC\\ | + | Families: XopC1 and XopC2\\ |
Prototype (XopC1): XCV2435 (// | Prototype (XopC1): XCV2435 (// | ||
GenBank ID (XopC1): [[https:// | GenBank ID (XopC1): [[https:// | ||
- | Prototype (XopC2): XOC_1264 (// | + | Prototype (XopC2): XOC_1264 (// |
GenBank ID (XopC2): [[https:// | GenBank ID (XopC2): [[https:// | ||
GenBank ID (XopC2; strain GX01): [[https:// | GenBank ID (XopC2; strain GX01): [[https:// | ||
Line 20: | Line 19: | ||
=== How discovered? === | === How discovered? === | ||
- | XopC was discovered in //X. campestris// | + | XopC was discovered in //X. campestris// |
=== (Experimental) evidence for being a T3E === | === (Experimental) evidence for being a T3E === | ||
Line 32: | Line 31: | ||
The //xopC// gene was shown to be expressed in a //hrpG//- and // | The //xopC// gene was shown to be expressed in a //hrpG//- and // | ||
- | qRT-PCR revealed that transcript levels of 15 out of 18 tested non-TAL effector genes (as well as the regulatory genes //hrpG// and //hrpX//), including //xopC//, were significantly reduced in the // | + | qRT-PCR revealed that transcript levels of 15 out of 18 tested non-TAL effector genes (as well as the regulatory genes //hrpG// and //hrpX//), including //xopC//, were significantly reduced in the // |
=== Phenotypes === | === Phenotypes === | ||
- | * A deletion of // | + | * A deletion of //xopC// did not affect pathogenicity or bacterial growth in plants (Noël //et al//., 2003). |
- | * Roden et al. did not find significant growth defects of a // | + | * Roden et al. did not find significant growth defects of a //Xcv// Δ//xopC// mutant in susceptible pepper and tomato leaves (Roden //et al.//, 2004) |
- | * Later, 86 // | + | * Later, 86 // |
- | * The absence of // | + | * The absence of //xopC// in the genome of //Xcv// led to an accelerated AvrBs1-induced HR in resistant pepper plants, if the plants were additionally stressed by exogenous application of salicylic acid (SA). This phenotype was complemented by //xopC//, but not by a //xopC// derivative carrying a mutation in the predicted HAD-like hydrolase sequence (Herzfeld, 2013). |
- | * Virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) of OAS-TL in planta abolished the acceleration of AvrBs1-mediated HR formation induced by the absence of // | + | * Virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) of OAS-TL in planta abolished the acceleration of AvrBs1-mediated HR formation induced by the absence of //xopC// in //Xcv// in resistant pepper plants dependent on SA. These data suggest, that the induction of the AvrBs1-dependent HR in resistant pepper plants is SA-stress dependently delayed by XopC, which is reliant on a HAD-like hydrolase domain in XopC. This delay is mediated by the XopC plant interaction partner OAS-TL. Furthermore, |
- | * XopC2 of //X. citri //pv. // | + | * XopC2 of //X. citri// pv. //punicae// was found to contribute to the bacterial blight development on pomegranate fruit plants. Xap //ΔxopC2// was demonstrated to cause reduced the blight lesions when inflitrated on pomegranate leaves, induce defense responses like callose deposition, ROS production and upregulate immune-responsive genes in its natural host plants (Mondal //et al.//, 2020). |
* Ectopic expression of XopC2 was found to promote jasmonate signaling and stomatal opening in transgenic rice plants, which were more susceptible to //X. oryzae// pv. // | * Ectopic expression of XopC2 was found to promote jasmonate signaling and stomatal opening in transgenic rice plants, which were more susceptible to //X. oryzae// pv. // | ||
Line 53: | Line 52: | ||
=== Interaction partners === | === Interaction partners === | ||
- | Yeast-2-hybrid studies revealed a XopC interactor, which also interacted with XopC in planta. The interactor localises to the plant cell cytoplasm and carries typical features of plant cytosolic O-acetylserine (thiol)lyases (OAS-TL). It shows OAS-TL activity in vivo and in vitro. The latter one is enhanced by adding XopC (Herzfeld, 2013). | + | Yeast-2-hybrid studies revealed a XopC interactor, which also interacted with XopC //in planta//. The interactor localises to the plant cell cytoplasm and carries typical features of plant cytosolic |
===== Conservation ===== | ===== Conservation ===== | ||
Line 62: | Line 61: | ||
The distantly related XopC2 has homologs in //X. citri//, //X. axonopodis//, | The distantly related XopC2 has homologs in //X. citri//, //X. axonopodis//, | ||
+ | |||
=== In other plant pathogens/ | === In other plant pathogens/ | ||
Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
The distantly related XopC2 has homologs in //X. citri//, //X. axonopodis//, | The distantly related XopC2 has homologs in //X. citri//, //X. axonopodis//, | ||
+ | |||
=== In other plant pathogens/ | === In other plant pathogens/ | ||
Line 104: | Line 105: | ||
Wang S, Li S, Wang J, Li Q, Xin XF, Zhou S, Wang Y, Li D, Xu J, Luo ZQ, He SY, Sun W (2021). A bacterial kinase phosphorylates OSK1 to suppress stomatal immunity in rice. Nat. Commun.12: 5479. doi: [[https:// | Wang S, Li S, Wang J, Li Q, Xin XF, Zhou S, Wang Y, Li D, Xu J, Luo ZQ, He SY, Sun W (2021). A bacterial kinase phosphorylates OSK1 to suppress stomatal immunity in rice. Nat. Commun.12: 5479. doi: [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Acknowledgements ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | This fact sheet is based upon work from COST Action CA16107 EuroXanth, supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology). | ||