EuroXanth DokuWiki

User Tools

Site Tools

Trace:
bacteria:t3e:xopap

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
bacteria:t3e:xopap [2024/08/06 15:35] – rkoebnikbacteria:t3e:xopap [2025/02/12 23:39] (current) – jfpothier
Line 12: Line 12:
 RefSeq ID: [[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein/WP_236504155.1|WP_236504155.1]] (426 aa)\\ RefSeq ID: [[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein/WP_236504155.1|WP_236504155.1]] (426 aa)\\
 3D structure: Unknown 3D structure: Unknown
- 
-=====   ===== 
  
 ===== Biological function ===== ===== Biological function =====
Line 23: Line 21:
  
 XopAP fused to the AvrBs2 reporter was shown to translocate into plant cells in an //hrpF//-dependent manner (Teper //et al//., 2016). XopAP fused to the AvrBs2 reporter was shown to translocate into plant cells in an //hrpF//-dependent manner (Teper //et al//., 2016).
 +
 === Regulation === === Regulation ===
  
-The //xopAP// gene was shown to be induced in //X. citri// subsp. //citri// strain 306 in nutrient broth (Jalan //et al//., 2013). In //X. euvesicatoria// strain 85-10, the //xopAP// gene does not contain a PIP-box motif in its promoter region (Teper //et al//., 2016). //xopAP //in // X. citri //pv. // citri //is positively regulated by the stringent response regulators RelA and SpoT (Zhang et al. 2019).+The //xopAP// gene was shown to be induced in //X. citri// subsp. //citri// strain 306 in nutrient broth (Jalan //et al//., 2013). In //X. euvesicatoria// strain 85-10, the //xopAP// gene does not contain a PIP-box motif in its promoter region (Teper //et al//., 2016). //xopAP// in //X. citri// pv. //citri// is positively regulated by the stringent response regulators RelA and SpoT (Zhang et al. 2019). 
 === Phenotypes === === Phenotypes ===
  
 A //Xanthomonas euvesicatoria// strain 85-10 mutant defective in //xopAP// was compromised in induction of disease symptoms in leaves of susceptible pepper plants, relative to wild-type 85-10. This phenotype was associated with reduced ion leakage and higher chlorophyll content as compared with leaves inoculated with wild-type 85-10. No differences were observed between the //xopAP// mutant and wild-type 85-10 in their ability to colonize the leaves of susceptible pepper plants (Teper //et al//., 2016). //Agrobacterium//-mediated expression of XopAP in //Nicotiana benthamiana// caused a bleaching phenotype that was detected three days after agroinfiltration, and was reflected by reduced chlorophyll content. However, in these experiments, XopAP did not induce significant increase in ion leakage in the inoculated area (Teper //et al//., 2016). Results from this study indicate that XopAP acts as a virulence determinant in //X. euvesicatoria//, and contributes to the development of disease symptoms. A further study by Popov and colleagues (2018) revealed that XopAP was among the //X. euvesicatoria// 85-10 effectors that inhibited PAMP-triggered immunity, as assessed by inhibition of activation of a flg22-inducible reporter gene in //Arabidopsis// protoplasts (Popov //et al//., 2018). Expression of XopAP in an attenuated mutant of //Pseudomonas syringae// pv. //tomato// (DC3000 ΔCEL) increased its virulence on tomato. Also, the DC3000 ΔCEL strain carrying //xopAP// induced decreased callose deposition in //Arabidopsis// cell walls than the DC3000 ΔCEL strain (Popov //et al//., 2018). XopAP shares similarity with the //Ralstonia solanacearum// type III effector RipAL and both effectors possess a putative lipase domain (Peeters //et al//., 2013; Teper //et al//., 2016). //R. solanacearum// RipAL was shown to suppress salicylic acid-mediated defense responses and induce jasmonic acid production in //N. benthamiana// (Nakano & Mukaihara, 2018). Mutations in the putative catalytic residues within the lipase-like domain of RipAL abolished these activities (Nakano & Mukaihara, 2018). A //Xanthomonas euvesicatoria// strain 85-10 mutant defective in //xopAP// was compromised in induction of disease symptoms in leaves of susceptible pepper plants, relative to wild-type 85-10. This phenotype was associated with reduced ion leakage and higher chlorophyll content as compared with leaves inoculated with wild-type 85-10. No differences were observed between the //xopAP// mutant and wild-type 85-10 in their ability to colonize the leaves of susceptible pepper plants (Teper //et al//., 2016). //Agrobacterium//-mediated expression of XopAP in //Nicotiana benthamiana// caused a bleaching phenotype that was detected three days after agroinfiltration, and was reflected by reduced chlorophyll content. However, in these experiments, XopAP did not induce significant increase in ion leakage in the inoculated area (Teper //et al//., 2016). Results from this study indicate that XopAP acts as a virulence determinant in //X. euvesicatoria//, and contributes to the development of disease symptoms. A further study by Popov and colleagues (2018) revealed that XopAP was among the //X. euvesicatoria// 85-10 effectors that inhibited PAMP-triggered immunity, as assessed by inhibition of activation of a flg22-inducible reporter gene in //Arabidopsis// protoplasts (Popov //et al//., 2018). Expression of XopAP in an attenuated mutant of //Pseudomonas syringae// pv. //tomato// (DC3000 ΔCEL) increased its virulence on tomato. Also, the DC3000 ΔCEL strain carrying //xopAP// induced decreased callose deposition in //Arabidopsis// cell walls than the DC3000 ΔCEL strain (Popov //et al//., 2018). XopAP shares similarity with the //Ralstonia solanacearum// type III effector RipAL and both effectors possess a putative lipase domain (Peeters //et al//., 2013; Teper //et al//., 2016). //R. solanacearum// RipAL was shown to suppress salicylic acid-mediated defense responses and induce jasmonic acid production in //N. benthamiana// (Nakano & Mukaihara, 2018). Mutations in the putative catalytic residues within the lipase-like domain of RipAL abolished these activities (Nakano & Mukaihara, 2018).
  
-Virulence and infection of //X. oryzae// pv. //oryzicola// (//Xoc//) increased in transgenic rice (//Oryza sativa// L.) plants overexpressing //xopAP//. XopAP inhibited the acidification of vacuoles by competing with vacuolar H<sup>+</sup>  -pyrophosphatase (V-PPase) for binding to PtdIns(3,5)P<sub>2</sub> , leading to stomatal opening. Transgenic rice overexpressing XopAP also showed inhibition of stomatal closure when challenged by //Xoc// infection and treatment with the PAMP flg22. Moreover, XopAP suppressed flg22-induced gene expression, reactive oxygen species burst and callose deposition in host plants, demonstrating that XopAP subverts PAMP-triggered immunity during //Xoc// infection. Taken together, these findings demonstrated that XopAP overcomes stomatal immunity in plants by binding to lipids (Liu //et al.//, 2022).+Virulence and infection of //X. oryzae// pv. //oryzicola// (//Xoc//) increased in transgenic rice (//Oryza sativa// L.) plants overexpressing //xopAP//. XopAP inhibited the acidification of vacuoles by competing with vacuolar H<sup>+</sup>-pyrophosphatase (V-PPase) for binding to PtdIns(3,5)P<sub>2</sub> , leading to stomatal opening. Transgenic rice overexpressing XopAP also showed inhibition of stomatal closure when challenged by //Xoc// infection and treatment with the PAMP flg22. Moreover, XopAP suppressed flg22-induced gene expression, reactive oxygen species burst and callose deposition in host plants, demonstrating that XopAP subverts PAMP-triggered immunity during //Xoc// infection. Taken together, these findings demonstrated that XopAP overcomes stomatal immunity in plants by binding to lipids (Liu //et al.//, 2022).
 === Localization === === Localization ===
  
Line 50: Line 50:
 ===== References ===== ===== References =====
  
-Constantin EC, Haegeman A, Van Vaerenbergh J, Baeyen S, Van Malderghem C, Maes M, Cottyn B (2017). Pathogenicity and virulence gene content of //Xanthomonas // strains infecting Araceae, formerly known as //Xanthomonas axonopodis // pv. //dieffenbachiae//. Plant Pathol. 66: 1539-1554. DOI: [[https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.12694|10.1111/ppa.12694]]+Constantin EC, Haegeman A, Van Vaerenbergh J, Baeyen S, Van Malderghem C, Maes M, Cottyn B (2017). Pathogenicity and virulence gene content of //Xanthomonas// strains infecting Araceae, formerly known as //Xanthomonas axonopodis// pv. //dieffenbachiae//. Plant Pathol. 66: 1539-1554. DOI: [[https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.12694|10.1111/ppa.12694]]
  
 Jalan N, Kumar D, Andrade MO, Yu F, Jones JB, Graham JH, White FF, Setubal JC, Wang N (2013). Comparative genomic and transcriptome analyses of pathotypes of //Xanthomonas citri// subsp. //citri// provide insights into mechanisms of bacterial virulence and host range. BMC Genomics 14: 551. DOI: [[https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-551|10.1186/1471-2164-14-551]] Jalan N, Kumar D, Andrade MO, Yu F, Jones JB, Graham JH, White FF, Setubal JC, Wang N (2013). Comparative genomic and transcriptome analyses of pathotypes of //Xanthomonas citri// subsp. //citri// provide insights into mechanisms of bacterial virulence and host range. BMC Genomics 14: 551. DOI: [[https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-551|10.1186/1471-2164-14-551]]
bacteria/t3e/xopap.1722954906.txt.gz · Last modified: 2024/08/06 15:35 by rkoebnik

Page Tools

Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International
CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki