This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| bacteria:t3e:xopak [2024/08/06 15:30] – [The Type III Effector XopAK from Xanthomonas] rkoebnik | bacteria:t3e:xopak [2025/07/04 23:16] (current) – jfpothier | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| Author: [[https:// | Author: [[https:// | ||
| Internal reviewer: [[https:// | Internal reviewer: [[https:// | ||
| - | Expert reviewer: [[https:// | + | Expert reviewer: [[https:// |
| Class: XopAK\\ | Class: XopAK\\ | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| XopAK can bind the // | XopAK can bind the // | ||
| + | |||
| === How discovered? === | === How discovered? === | ||
| XopAK was discovered using a machine-learning approach (Teper //et al//., 2016). | XopAK was discovered using a machine-learning approach (Teper //et al//., 2016). | ||
| + | |||
| === (Experimental) evidence for being a T3E === | === (Experimental) evidence for being a T3E === | ||
| XopAK, fused to the AvrBs2 reporter, was shown to translocate into plant cells in an // | XopAK, fused to the AvrBs2 reporter, was shown to translocate into plant cells in an // | ||
| + | |||
| === Regulation === | === Regulation === | ||
| Line 28: | Line 31: | ||
| Disease severity, ion leakage, chlorophyll content of pepper plants inoculated with a mutant strain obtained by insertion mutagenesis of //xopAK// and //in planta// bacterial growth were not affected as compared to plants inoculated with the parent strain //X. euvesicatoria// | Disease severity, ion leakage, chlorophyll content of pepper plants inoculated with a mutant strain obtained by insertion mutagenesis of //xopAK// and //in planta// bacterial growth were not affected as compared to plants inoculated with the parent strain //X. euvesicatoria// | ||
| + | |||
| === Localization === | === Localization === | ||
| Upon // | Upon // | ||
| + | |||
| === Enzymatic function === | === Enzymatic function === | ||
| XopAK has been predicted to be a deaminase (Teper //et al//., 2016). | XopAK has been predicted to be a deaminase (Teper //et al//., 2016). | ||
| + | |||
| === Interaction partners === | === Interaction partners === | ||
| XopAK binds to the // | XopAK binds to the // | ||
| + | |||
| ===== Conservation ===== | ===== Conservation ===== | ||
| Line 45: | Line 52: | ||
| Yes (//e.g.//, // | Yes (//e.g.//, // | ||
| + | |||
| ===== References ===== | ===== References ===== | ||
| Line 59: | Line 67: | ||
| Teper D, Burstein D, Salomon D, Gershovitz M, Pupko T, Sessa G (2016). Identification of novel // | Teper D, Burstein D, Salomon D, Gershovitz M, Pupko T, Sessa G (2016). Identification of novel // | ||
| - | Zhang HM, Sun BL, Wu W, Li Y, Yin ZY, Lu CC, Zhao HP, Kong LG, Ding XH (2024). The MYB transcription factor OsMYBxoc1 regulates resistance to// Xoc// by directly repressing transcription of the iron transport gene // | + | Zhang HM, Sun BL, Wu W, Li Y, Yin ZY, Lu CC, Zhao HP, Kong LG, Ding XH (2024). The MYB transcription factor OsMYBxoc1 regulates resistance to //Xoc// by directly repressing transcription of the iron transport gene // |
| + | |||
| + | ===== Acknowledgements ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | This fact sheet is based upon work from COST Action CA16107 EuroXanth, supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology). | ||