This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
bacteria:t3e:xopai [2023/12/08 13:00] – [Biological function] rkoebnik | bacteria:t3e:xopai [2025/02/12 23:26] (current) – jfpothier | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | ====== XopAI ====== | + | ====== |
- | Author: [[https:// | + | Author: [[https:// |
- | Internal reviewer: \\ | + | |
- | Expert reviewer: **WANTED!** | + | |
Class: XopAI\\ | Class: XopAI\\ | ||
Line 16: | Line 14: | ||
=== How discovered? === | === How discovered? === | ||
+ | Based on the complete genome sequence, XopAI (XAC3230) was proposed as a Hrp regulon candidate (da Silva //et al.//, 2002). | ||
+ | |||
+ | Co-regulation of //xopAI// with other HrpG-controlled genes was also proposed by Noël //et al.// (2006) based on the observation that 200 bp of the 5' sequence including promoter and coding regions of //xopE2// (// | ||
+ | |||
+ | Based on homology to effectors from // | ||
=== (Experimental) evidence for being a T3E === | === (Experimental) evidence for being a T3E === | ||
+ | |||
+ | Unknown. | ||
=== Regulation === | === Regulation === | ||
+ | Using microarrays, | ||
=== Phenotypes === | === Phenotypes === | ||
+ | |||
+ | Unknown. | ||
=== Localization === | === Localization === | ||
+ | The XopAI N‐terminal domain contains a myristoylation motif, which was previously identified in several T3Es of //P. syringae//, indicating that effectors with this N‐terminal domain are targeted to host cellular membranes (White //et al.//, 2009). | ||
=== Enzymatic function === | === Enzymatic function === | ||
Line 30: | Line 39: | ||
XopAI was predicted to be a member of the arginine-specific mono-ADP-ribosyltransferase (mART) family. However, the crystal structure of XopAI revealed an altered active site that is unsuitable to bind the cofactor NAD+, but with the capability to capture an arginine-containing peptide from XopAI itself. Based on this finding, it was proposed that XopAI may not be a qualified mART, and it would exert different effects on host cells (Liu //et al.//, 2019). | XopAI was predicted to be a member of the arginine-specific mono-ADP-ribosyltransferase (mART) family. However, the crystal structure of XopAI revealed an altered active site that is unsuitable to bind the cofactor NAD+, but with the capability to capture an arginine-containing peptide from XopAI itself. Based on this finding, it was proposed that XopAI may not be a qualified mART, and it would exert different effects on host cells (Liu //et al.//, 2019). | ||
- | Structural homologs of XopAI are, among others, the HopU1 (// | + | Structural homologs of XopAI are, among others, the HopU1 (// |
=== Interaction partners === | === Interaction partners === | ||
Line 37: | Line 46: | ||
=== In xanthomonads === | === In xanthomonads === | ||
- | XopAI is conserved in the Citrus canker strains, including //X. citri// pv. //citri// and //X. citri// pv. // | + | XopAI is conserved in the Citrus canker strains, including //X. citri// pv. //citri// and //X. citri// pv. // |
- | XopAI homologs were also found in //X. citri// pv. //bilvae// and //X. citri// pv. // | + | XopAI homologs were also found in //X. citri// pv. //bilvae// and //X. citri// pv. // |
=== In other plant pathogens/ | === In other plant pathogens/ | ||
Line 45: | Line 54: | ||
===== References ===== | ===== References ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | da Silva AC, Ferro JA, Reinach FC, Farah CS, Furlan LR, Quaggio RB, Monteiro-Vitorello CB, Van Sluys MA, Almeida NF, Alves LM, do Amaral AM, Bertolini MC, Camargo LE, Camarotte G, Cannavan F, Cardozo J, Chambergo F, Ciapina LP, Cicarelli RM, Coutinho LL, Cursino-Santos JR, El-Dorry H, Faria JB, Ferreira AJ, Ferreira RC, Ferro MI, Formighieri EF, Franco MC, Greggio CC, Gruber A, Katsuyama AM, Kishi LT, Leite RP, Lemos EG, Lemos MV, Locali EC, Machado MA, Madeira AM, Martinez-Rossi NM, Martins EC, Meidanis J, Menck CF, Miyaki CY, Moon DH, Moreira LM, Novo MT, Okura VK, Oliveira MC, Oliveira VR, Pereira HA, Rossi A, Sena JA, Silva C, de Souza RF, Spinola LA, Takita MA, Tamura RE, Teixeira EC, Tezza RI, Trindade dos Santos M, Truffi D, Tsai SM, White FF, Setubal JC, Kitajima JP (2002). Comparison of the genomes of two // | ||
+ | |||
+ | de Laia ML, Moreira LM, Gonçalves JF, Ferro MI, Pinto Rodrigues AC, dos Santos JN, Felestrino ÉB, Ferro JA (2019). Gene expression analysis identifies hypothetical genes that may be critical during the infection process of // | ||
+ | Electron. J. Biotechnol. 42: 30-41. DOI: 10.1016/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | Fu Z (2008). // | ||
Gaurav I, Thakur A, Kumar G, Long Q, Zhang K, Sidu RK, Thakur S, Sarkar RK, Kumar A, Iyaswamy A, Yang Z (2023). Delivery of apoplastic extracellular vesicles encapsulating green-synthesized silver nanoparticles to treat citrus canker. Nanomaterials (Basel) 13: 1306. DOI: [[https:// | Gaurav I, Thakur A, Kumar G, Long Q, Zhang K, Sidu RK, Thakur S, Sarkar RK, Kumar A, Iyaswamy A, Yang Z (2023). Delivery of apoplastic extracellular vesicles encapsulating green-synthesized silver nanoparticles to treat citrus canker. Nanomaterials (Basel) 13: 1306. DOI: [[https:// | ||
Line 53: | Line 69: | ||
Moreira LM, Almeida NF Jr, Potnis N, Digiampietri LA, Adi SS, Bortolossi JC, da Silva AC, da Silva AM, de Moraes FE, de Oliveira JC, de Souza RF, Facincani AP, Ferraz AL, Ferro MI, Furlan LR, Gimenez DF, Jones JB, Kitajima EW, Laia ML, Leite RP Jr, Nishiyama MY, Rodrigues Neto J, Nociti LA, Norman DJ, Ostroski EH, Pereira HA Jr, Staskawicz BJ, Tezza RI, Ferro JA, Vinatzer BA, Setubal JC (2010). Novel insights into the genomic basis of citrus canker based on the genome sequences of two strains of // | Moreira LM, Almeida NF Jr, Potnis N, Digiampietri LA, Adi SS, Bortolossi JC, da Silva AC, da Silva AM, de Moraes FE, de Oliveira JC, de Souza RF, Facincani AP, Ferraz AL, Ferro MI, Furlan LR, Gimenez DF, Jones JB, Kitajima EW, Laia ML, Leite RP Jr, Nishiyama MY, Rodrigues Neto J, Nociti LA, Norman DJ, Ostroski EH, Pereira HA Jr, Staskawicz BJ, Tezza RI, Ferro JA, Vinatzer BA, Setubal JC (2010). Novel insights into the genomic basis of citrus canker based on the genome sequences of two strains of // | ||
+ | |||
+ | Noël L, Thieme F, Gäbler J, Büttner D, Bonas U (2003). XopC and XopJ, two novel type III effector proteins from Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria. J. Bacteriol. 185: 7092-7102. DOI: [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | Stavrinides J, Ma W, Guttman DS (2006). Terminal reassortment drives the quantum evolution of type III effectors in bacterial pathogens. PLoS Pathog. 2: e104. DOI: [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | White FF, Potnis N, Jones JB, Koebnik R (2009). The type III effectors of // | ||